* [RAUC] NAND flash
@ 2017-04-05 13:10 caglar.kilimci
2017-04-05 14:15 ` Enrico Joerns
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: caglar.kilimci @ 2017-04-05 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rauc
Hello,
I have a question about storage type, NAND. The documentation [1] emphasizes not to use NAND flash but why?
[1] http://rauc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/updating.html?highlight=nand
Sincerely,
Caglar
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
_______________________________________________
RAUC mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RAUC] NAND flash
2017-04-05 13:10 [RAUC] NAND flash caglar.kilimci
@ 2017-04-05 14:15 ` Enrico Joerns
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Joerns @ 2017-04-05 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caglar.kilimci; +Cc: rauc
Hi Caglar,
On 04/05/2017 03:10 PM, caglar.kilimci@accenture.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about storage type, NAND. The documentation [1] emphasizes not to use NAND flash but why?
>
> [1] http://rauc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/updating.html?highlight=nand
well, this is a general advice, not something RAUC-specific. RAUC can
handle NAND on the different layers, either for writing raw data with
`nandwrite` or by using 'NAND-filesystems' such as UBI(FS).
But, from ours and others daily experience and knowledge about the
technology the general conclusion is that raw NANDs, especially MLCs,
are very, very hard to handle.
There are many different and hardware-specific effects that you have to
deal with, and if you see how hard for example developers from the UBI
filesystem attempt to solve this, [1] you may also conclude that you
really want to avoid using NANDs on this level.
Our advice instead would be to use eMMCs instead, where all the critical
stuff is hidden and handled internally, by hardware-controllers designed
by those who (hopefully) really know about the quirks of their NAND chips.
I hope I could make that point a little clearer, I know that this
documentation chapter is not our most extensive one, yet. Patches are
always welcome ;)
Best regards
Enrico
[1]
http://free-electrons.com/pub/conferences/2016/elce/brezillon-ubi-mlc/ubi-mlc.pdf
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Enrico Jörns |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5080 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
RAUC mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-05 14:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-05 13:10 [RAUC] NAND flash caglar.kilimci
2017-04-05 14:15 ` Enrico Joerns
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox