From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx0.itk-engineering.de ([212.121.145.30]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mda18-0007px-FH for meta-rauc@pengutronix.de; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:30:07 +0200 From: Martin Hollingsworth Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:30:05 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Language: de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [meta-rauc] yocto sstate caching of bundles List-Id: meta-rauc Layer for Yocto - Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0917390908==" Errors-To: meta-rauc-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "meta-rauc" To: "meta-rauc@pengutronix.de" --===============0917390908== Content-Language: de-DE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_d2bbdd5a95ae4304b73d361a5ea8fc01itkengineeringde_" --_000_d2bbdd5a95ae4304b73d361a5ea8fc01itkengineeringde_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello meta-rauc list, Is anyone here using Yocto SSTATE caching together with meta-rauc? https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#share= d-state-cache We enabled sstate caching a few days weeks ago, and are now seeing that our= build outputs for image and bundle have different build timestamps. The im= age file is always with the current timestamp, while the bundle often uses = an older timestamp. I would assume a bundle must always be rebuild from the= current image. Example: - -20211020001242.rootfs.wic.xz -20211015001217.raucb Anyone stumbled upon that? Thanks and Greetings, Martin Hollingsworth --_000_d2bbdd5a95ae4304b73d361a5ea8fc01itkengineeringde_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello meta-rauc list,

Is anyone here using Yocto SSTA= TE caching together with meta-rauc?

https= ://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#shared-sta= te-cache

 

We enabled sstate caching a few= days weeks ago, and are now seeing that our build outputs for image and bu= ndle have different build timestamps. The image file is always with the cur= rent timestamp, while the bundle often uses an older timestamp. I would assume a bundle must always be rebuild fr= om the current image.

 

Example:

<imagename>-<machine> -20211020001242.rootfs.wic.xz

<bundlename><machine>-20211015001217.raucb

 

Anyone stumbled upon that?=

 

Thanks and Greetings,

Martin Hollingsworth=

--_000_d2bbdd5a95ae4304b73d361a5ea8fc01itkengineeringde_-- --===============0917390908== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ meta-rauc mailing list --===============0917390908==--